How odd :?
Its not worded very well is it? x
Sounds like the adopter has them still, but is giving the rspca an ultimatum as they can't accommodate
Sent from my LG-P880 using Tapatalk
I agree with Tash, that the RSPCA won't have them. The adopter has given the ultimatum so the RSPCA are trying to find them a home despite not being able to take them. RSPCA Suffolk West is run by foster homes only, so they will have limited options for where they can go.
Surly having healthy rabbits put to sleep is cruelty and that the RSPCA should act????
Surly having healthy rabbits put to sleep is cruelty and that the RSPCA should act????
I read it as: these rabbits were adopted from this particular branch and the owner can no longer keep them. In line with their adoption contract they have asked the branch to take them back. The branch is full at present and unable to take them right now. The owner has therefore threatened to take them to be pts. The branch has therefore agreed to advertise them to see if they can find them a home directly (they are prob already neutered), this avoiding the problem that they don't have anywhere for them right now, and avoiding them being pts. Seems a fairly sensible interim compromise to me.
How is humanely putting a rabbit to sleep, cruelty? :? It's not nice, but there is nothing illegal about it.
Who said it was illegal?
This post does not endear me to the RSPCA.
They are actually currently advertised as being rehomed, so presumably a new home has already been found for them?