I can see your point, but I think those policies are ace. It bugs me when people think a cat needs total freedom, but a bunny in a box is ok
If a Rescue strongly believes in something, I think they should stick to it as they will only regret it when they compromise & there's a million other Rescues you can adopt from with less restrictions
I think thats a little unfair maybe. I don't have hundreds to spend on accomodation, but i do have the money to spend ~75/yr on vaccs (2x myxi 1x vhd) and im sure that goes the same for a lot of people?
But what if the bunnies get sick? How would you pay for that? My point was just that if you are willing to spend a decent amount of money on large secure accommodation or even get the materials cheap and put the effort ino building it yourself then it's kinda proof that the owner will put the mileage into bunny care in general.
I am more than happy to adhere to various housing standards that rescues have and don't really see the problem with conforming to what is asked. If I don't and can't modifiy my accommodation to fit with specific requirements I'll just find somewhere that will home to me as there are loads of rescues to choose from.
I can see your point, but I think those policies are ace. It bugs me when people think a cat needs total freedom, but a bunny in a box is ok
If a Rescue strongly believes in something, I think they should stick to it as they will only regret it when they compromise & there's a million other Rescues you can adopt from with less restrictions
I'll just find somewhere that will home to me as there are loads of rescues to choose from
I'm confused Rhian (and by no means want to start an argument, this is if anything for me to learn from for the future:wave.
You say you're happy to adhere to a rescues housing standards, but if a rescue you go to says you don't measure up, you'll go to another that has lower standards? Doesn't that defeat the object of the standards in the first place?
ETA: and in answer to your other question, sorry i forgot to answer it, i have money saved for exactly that, along with pet insurance which i've all picked up from learning on RU.
I'm confused Rhian (and by no means want to start an argument, this is if anything for me to learn from for the future:wave.
You say you're happy to adhere to a rescues housing standards, but if a rescue you go to says you don't measure up, you'll go to another that has lower standards? Doesn't that defeat the object of the standards in the first place?
ETA: and in answer to your other question, sorry i forgot to answer it, i have money saved for exactly that, along with pet insurance which i've all picked up from learning on RU.
I think encouraging people to let rabbits free in the garden unsupervised is very irresponsible. There is no such thing as a totally secure garden, unless you have concrete walls around the whole garden with concrete foundations and a secure wire roof over the whole garden. With cats, stray dogs and foxes around rabbits are easy prey.
With those housing requirements I also doubt they rehome many rabbits.
Its not always that easy tho. As I said most the rescues in my area insist on attached runs and those that don't, don't vaccinate or neuter either so how can I be sure they are even legitimate rescues.
You could travel. I have travelled miles to rehome rats so it's doable
I am just trying to say that if a rescue says that a run has to be 16 feet wide but my garden is only 15 feet wide and won't bend their rules to allow for total floor space then there is nothing I can do to make my garden bigger. This would be the only sort of reason I would go to another rescue as I had said if I can't not won't modify the accommodation then I would look elsewhere.
Thank yuo for your clarification I agree with you in that respect, but back to the OP - it does restrict the people they can rehome to, so some poor buns may be stuck in rescue for a long time, if someone doesn't have a) the space or b) the money to meet their requirements, when another rescue only wants say a 6x2 hutch with a 6x4 run attached. I do agree, the more space the better, but surely that space is better than nothing.
I've thought this for a long time but not had the nereve to mention it for fear of being jumped on. I think everyone should be judged as an individual as to their suitability for adopting buns. Everyone has different types of houses and gardens. I know people with tiny gardens/yards who have very happy and loved bunnys.
But how can you say that this rabbit can have smaller housing than this other rabbit just because someone irresponsible kept one of them in a shoe box? Also, people will just go for the cheap option and I think it's a slippered slope for sub-standard care. If someone is not willing to spend a couple of hundred on decent accommodation then it's unlikely they will keep up with vaccinations etc.
I have some of these worries too. We free-range our buns most of the time in a 6m x 8m walled garden with a shelter. Our hutch is 5' x 2' two-tier. Our run is only for if free-ranging can't happen because the oil-delivery is due, or some such. Our run is 5' x 5' which would be silly if it was used daily, but is fine for now and then. It is not attached. I often have this feeling that we would be rejected on homecheck. I'm nervous even asking. Would we?
I think encouraging people to let rabbits free in the garden unsupervised is very irresponsible. There is no such thing as a totally secure garden, unless you have concrete walls around the whole garden with concrete foundations and a secure wire roof over the whole garden. With cats, stray dogs and foxes around rabbits are easy prey.
With those housing requirements I also doubt they rehome many rabbits.