:lol: :lol: :lol:
:lol: :lol: :lol:
Immature :roll:
Just goggle it. Heres one of the first thing that comes up: http://exoticpets.about.com/cs/guineapigs/a/woodshavings.htm
I can't believe you guys didn't know this. Any of the knowledgeable people on here can tell you the same thing.
bearing in mind, I actually agree with you that I would avoid shavings (the type we get in the UK!!!) you didn't choose a great link to support your point....
Cedar and pine became popular for pet bedding material because they are good at controlling odor and have some natural insecticidal properties (they kill or repel bugs, especially cedar). These softwood shavings smell nice due to the volatile compounds (e.g. aromatic hydrocarbons, phenols) that are given off. Unfortunately these compounds have been implicated as a potential health risk, especially with regards to respiratory problems (asthma, inflammation, allergic responses) and changes in the liver.
Many of the studies on wood toxicity have actually been conducted on humans, who are exposed to these woods and their by products in the wood product industry (such as those who work in lumber mills who are exposed to lots of wood dust), and these studies often compare the incidence of disease in workers in the wood product industry compared to other workers or the average population. Obviously, this is a much different type of exposure compared to our pets.
Studies of laboratory animals have shown fairly dramatic changes in liver enzymes on animals housed on cedar bedding. This in turn can effect the metabolism of drugs including anesthetics, but there is not much information on a direct link between these changes and disease or clinical symptoms. The changes in liver enzymes can be problematic for research animals, but the impact on pets hasn't really be studied, as far as I can tell.
Bottom Line
Based on the studies that implicate the compounds from cedar in allergic and respiratory diseases as well as the impact on liver enzymes, it seems it may well be prudent to avoid cedar shavings as bedding or litter, especially since alternatives are available.
With pine shavings, the problem isn't as clear cut. Pine shavings emit similar volatile compounds as cedar, but the risks aren't clear. It is thought that heat treating pine shavings may reduce the levels of aromatic hydrocarbons that have been implicated as a potential concern, so that products such as kiln dried pine are safe (many pet products are heat treated).
Since the information about the problems is circumstantial and hasn't been evaluated in the context of health problems in exotic pets, I'm hesitant to make firm recommendations. That said, it has been my personal choice to avoid cedar; I have used pine in the past, though recently I have been trying out many of the alternatives available on the market instead.
I barely glanced at it, I don't care enough to waste my time finding a good link for them when they will just ignore my advice. Apparently happy has some sort of vendetta against me because I live in the US :roll:
It is said that kiln dried might be safe. There are better alternatives though.
ETA: no, the generalization thing is apparently referring to how I once said that she and a few others were generalizing the US.
You can't be bothered to find a good link but you care enough to waste time arguing about it in this thread...:? seems counter productive to me.I barely glanced at it, I don't care enough to waste my time finding a good link for them when they will just ignore my advice. Apparently happy has some sort of vendetta against me because I live in the US :roll:
It is said that kiln dried might be safe. There are better alternatives though.
You can't be bothered to find a good link but you care enough to waste time arguing about it in this thread... seems counter productive to me.
Seriously? :lol: I have nothing against the US and wish to live there. I have many many friends there.
Trust me, I have nothing against you for living in the US.
You have magical pine trees and cedar trees in Scotland? Or are they made from something else? Any soft wood isn't good.
Then what are you always attacking me for Ever since the arguments about the US like 2 months ago? A couple days ago you brought up America in a thread that had nothing to do with it and I never mentioned America either. Now again. When I wasnt trying to offend anyone or anything.. And if I remember correctly you were against the US in those threads.
No, because there just isn't any point. They won't listen and if they wanted to learn they could type "pine shavings" into goggle themselves.
Whatever. Your choice. There are many options though and just because it won't hurt your current hamsters (or doesn't seem to) doesn't mean it won't hurt any future hamsters. Before I knew (when I was 12) I housed mine on pine and I had a hamster and mouse get itchy and my mouse got bald patches.
I think it is the owners decision at the end of the day, to weigh up the pros and cons.
I personally think that, although the evidence is not conclusive, it is not worth the risk with my bunny's health, and so do not use them for his trays.
I do however use shavings for my hamster. I am still debating whether its worth changing or not, as I actually think megazorb is a bit dustier. There is no way I'd use newspaper or shredded paper, hamsters are so tiny if the ink was the wrong type it would affect her more than a rabbit. The reason I have not changed her over is because I believe the risk to her is smaller, as it is dust extracted and she doesnt wee on it (she has a litter box with special litter).
I think whether they are dangerous or not largely depends on how you use them.
its worth the risk with your hamster's health, but not your rabbit's health?
newspaper ink in the US and UK is made of veggie oil. It's a law in case kids get it and stick it in their mouth or something.
Not to be argumentative, but wouldn't you think that it would be more dangerous for the hamster since the shavings will be contained in a cage for the hamster and the hamster walks and burrows all through it? Whereas it would just be in a litter pan for a rabbit.
There really is conclusive proof. Dangerous toxic phenols, what more do you need to know?
I think this is another one of those things where its different in the US. People get completely flamed for this kind of thing on US forums.