Willow, you started this thread to engage with people and find out their views. Just because we don't all share your opinion that capital punishment is justified, doesn't mean you should be patronising. You should be open to other people's views as we are to yours.
The biblical argument is a non-starter. The bible isn't one document, but a patchwork of papers which often contradict each other. If you quote a piece, there is sure to be another that is in polarity to it. Jesus also said to turn the other cheek. I prefer to make my judgements on how today's society functions, rather than that of one 2000 years ago.
I don't see how the crime of killing a child is any worse than killing an adult. Surely, if you condemn killing, it should be for any age. What you decry is the method. Therefore, you could say that someone who rapes a child should be hung, what about the rapist of an adult. This opens a whole can of worms. At what age would you define a child not being a child. Would it be fair if the legal definition was reached and a spectacular murder was committed on someone who was a day over that age. Society would clamber for it to be carried out and then the line is crossed.
Child killers are abhorrent, but I see them as a consequence of society and society should deal with them in a way that shows our morality, not theirs.
As for torturing someone daily, would the person who made that statement really want to do that, and if not, why ask someone else to do it. It is far to dark and malevolent for me to believe.
The biblical argument is a non-starter. The bible isn't one document, but a patchwork of papers which often contradict each other. If you quote a piece, there is sure to be another that is in polarity to it. Jesus also said to turn the other cheek. I prefer to make my judgements on how today's society functions, rather than that of one 2000 years ago.
I don't see how the crime of killing a child is any worse than killing an adult. Surely, if you condemn killing, it should be for any age. What you decry is the method. Therefore, you could say that someone who rapes a child should be hung, what about the rapist of an adult. This opens a whole can of worms. At what age would you define a child not being a child. Would it be fair if the legal definition was reached and a spectacular murder was committed on someone who was a day over that age. Society would clamber for it to be carried out and then the line is crossed.
Child killers are abhorrent, but I see them as a consequence of society and society should deal with them in a way that shows our morality, not theirs.
As for torturing someone daily, would the person who made that statement really want to do that, and if not, why ask someone else to do it. It is far to dark and malevolent for me to believe.