I find it rather amusing how breeders....well 'good' breeders seem to have healthier animals. Its well known a mongrel is healthier than a pedigree. I know of many mutts who have seen 17, but very few pedigree dogs can boast the same. Also, Emma aka Toby's bunnie is 16, and hes a crossbreed, name me one pedigree bun who has seen even 12.
Pedigrees are bred for looks and you can't tell by looking at animal if they have a good heart etc, so when two pedigrees are bred you have a higher chance of a problem developing. Take Rexs and other giant breeds who drop dead because of a heart murmor, and the breeder could well have been what many consider to be 'good'. Also lops who have a snout so flat they are prone to snuffles. Its not just teeth. A breeder can't possibly claim their animals are healthier as they don't know what a litter can produce.
TBH this whole thread is ridiculous and I have just sat and read the whole thing and talk about contradicting yourself.....:? I for one am confused about some comments on here.