Beau Belle
Mama Doe
Hello,
My Poppet passed away two weeks ago, and I made a formal complaint about what I felt was a lack of care and concern by the receptionist/nurse at the vets when I took my poorly bun in without having made a prior appointment (Poppet passed away shortly afterwards so my assessment of her condition as 'critical' was correct).
Today I received a letter from the practice manager, and it has greatly upset me. In the letter, the practice manager states that a rabbit who has not eaten for 12 hours (which wasn't the case by the way, we'd syringe-fed her) is not in an immediate life ending condition.
Is this correct? My understanding is that they *must* eat regularly? I feel very confused about this. I feel that they somehow deem me hysterical for insisting that she normally eats loads, and would only ever pass up an opportunity of treats due to being sick.
Further on, she shames me for not having opted for a necropsy - my immediate reaction was 'no' but I feel that must be my choice. In hindsight I might choose differently, but I was in shock - the vet had stated I'd see an improvement within the hour, so Poppet passing within 30mins was traumatic enough.
She then states that the receptionist in question is "quite possibly the kindest person I have ever met" - what kind of sycophantic BS is that?? I'd expect that from a mother or a partner (biased) but not from a practice manager handling a complaint.
I'm upset and confused. I don't know what to think.
My Poppet passed away two weeks ago, and I made a formal complaint about what I felt was a lack of care and concern by the receptionist/nurse at the vets when I took my poorly bun in without having made a prior appointment (Poppet passed away shortly afterwards so my assessment of her condition as 'critical' was correct).
Today I received a letter from the practice manager, and it has greatly upset me. In the letter, the practice manager states that a rabbit who has not eaten for 12 hours (which wasn't the case by the way, we'd syringe-fed her) is not in an immediate life ending condition.
Is this correct? My understanding is that they *must* eat regularly? I feel very confused about this. I feel that they somehow deem me hysterical for insisting that she normally eats loads, and would only ever pass up an opportunity of treats due to being sick.
Further on, she shames me for not having opted for a necropsy - my immediate reaction was 'no' but I feel that must be my choice. In hindsight I might choose differently, but I was in shock - the vet had stated I'd see an improvement within the hour, so Poppet passing within 30mins was traumatic enough.
She then states that the receptionist in question is "quite possibly the kindest person I have ever met" - what kind of sycophantic BS is that?? I'd expect that from a mother or a partner (biased) but not from a practice manager handling a complaint.
I'm upset and confused. I don't know what to think.